Search This Blog

Sunday, June 7, 2026

Singularity AI 🤖 Technological

Technological Singularity
http://i.imgur.com/G5DKX1P.gif
👇  🤖  👇
In the not-so-distant future, we could reach the technological singularity – when artificial and human intelligence merges to become one.
👉          👉         Click      to   Choose Video 
A.I. Singularity
Technological Singularity
👇  🤖  👇
  ****
~*~*~~*~*~~*~*~~*~*~~*~*~~*~*~*~*~~*~*~~*~*~
********
~*~*~~*~*~~*~*~~*~*~~*~*~~*~*~*~*~~*~*~~*~*~
The technological singularity - or simply the singularity - is a hypothetical future point in time at which technological growth becomes uncontrollable and irreversible, resulting in unforeseeable consequences for human civilization. According to the most popular version of the singularity hypothesis, I. J. Good's intelligence explosion model of 1965, an upgradable intelligent agent could eventually enter a positive feedback loop of self-improvement cycles, each new and more intelligent generation appearing more and more rapidly, causing a rapid increase ("explosion") in intelligence which would ultimately result in a powerful superintelligence, qualitatively far surpassing all human intelligence.
The Hungarian-American mathematician John von Neumann (1903-1957) became the first known person to use the concept of a "singularity" in the technological context. Stanislaw Ulam reported in 1958 an earlier discussion with von Neumann "centered on the accelerating progress of technology and changes in the mode of human life, which gives the appearance of approaching some essential singularity in the history of the race beyond which human affairs, as we know them, could not continue". Subsequent authors have echoed this viewpoint.
The concept and the term "singularity" were popularized by Vernor Vinge - first in 1983 (in an article that claimed that once humans create intelligences greater than their own, there will be a technological and social transition similar in some sense to "the knotted space-time at the center of a black hole",) and later in his 1993 essay The Coming Technological Singularity, (in which he wrote that it would signal the end of the human era, as the new superintelligence would continue to upgrade itself and would advance technologically at an incomprehensible rate). He wrote that he would be surprised if it occurred before 2005 or after 2030. Another significant contributor to wider circulation of the notion was Ray Kurzweil's 2005 book The Singularity Is Near, predicting singularity by 2045.
Some scientists, including Stephen Hawking, have expressed concern that artificial superintelligence (ASI) could result in human extinction. The consequences of a technological singularity and its potential benefit or harm to the human race have been intensely debated.
Prominent technologists and academics - including Paul Allen, Jeff Hawkins, John Holland, Jaron Lanier, Steven Pinker, Theodore Modis, and Gordon Moore - dispute the plausibility of a technological singularity and an associated artificial-intelligence explosion. One claim made was that the artificial-intelligence growth is likely to run into decreasing returns instead of accelerating ones, as was observed in previously developed human technologies. 
 
The Singularity Is Near: 
When Humans Transcend Biology is a 2005 non-fiction book about artificial intelligence and the future of humanity by inventor and futurist Ray Kurzweil. A sequel book, The Singularity Is Nearer, is scheduled to be released on June 25, 2024.
The book builds on the ideas introduced in Kurzweil's previous books, The Age of Intelligent Machines (1990) and The Age of Spiritual Machines (1999). In the book, Kurzweil embraces the term "the singularity", which was popularized by Vernor Vinge in his 1993 essay "The Coming Technological Singularity."
Kurzweil describes his law of accelerating returns which predicts an exponential increase in technologies like computers, genetics, nanotechnology, robotics and artificial intelligence. Once the singularity has been reached, Kurzweil says that machine intelligence will be infinitely more powerful than all human intelligence combined. The singularity is also the point at which machines' intelligence and humans would merge; Kurzweil predicts this date: "I set the date for the Singularity—representing a profound and disruptive transformation in human capability—as 2045".
 
La singularité technologique (ou simplement la Singularité) est l'hypothèse selon laquelle l'invention de l'intelligence artificielle déclencherait un emballement de la croissance technologique qui induirait des changements imprévisibles dans la société humaine.

Au-delà de ce point, le progrès ne serait plus l’œuvre que d’intelligences artificielles qui s’auto-amélioreraient, de nouvelles générations de plus en plus intelligentes apparaissant de plus en plus rapidement dans une « explosion d'intelligence », débouchant sur une puissante superintelligence qui dépasserait qualitativement de loin l'intelligence humaine.

Le risque serait que l'humanité perde le contrôle de son destin. L'auteur de science fiction Vernor Vinge est même convaincu, dans son essai La venue de la singularité technologique, que la singularité signifierait la fin de l'ère humaine, la nouvelle superintelligence continuant de s'améliorer et d'évoluer technologiquement à une vitesse incompréhensible pour les humains.

Cette notion de singularité technologique aurait été envisagée par John von Neumann dès les années 1950 et ses conséquences ont été débattues dans les années 1960 par I. J. Good. Selon Ray Kurzweil7, cofondateur de la Singularity University, la singularité deviendrait réalité approximativement en 2045.

La possibilité et la date de survenue de cet évènement hypothétique fait toutefois l'objet de débats entre scientifiques. Plusieurs futurologues et transhumanistes l’attendent pour la troisième décennie du XXIe siècle

 
Variations
Non-AI singularity
Some writers use "the singularity" in a broader way to refer to any radical changes in society brought about by new technology (such as molecular nanotechnology), although Vinge and other writers specifically state that without superintelligence, such changes would not qualify as a true singularity.

Predictions
In 1965, I. J. Good wrote that it is more probable than not that an ultra-intelligent machine would be built in the twentieth century. In 1993, Vinge predicted greater-than-human intelligence between 2005 and 2030. In 1996, Yudkowsky predicted a singularity in 2021. In 2005, Kurzweil predicted human-level AI around 2029, and the singularity in 2045. In a 2017 interview, Kurzweil reaffirmed his estimates. In 1988, Moravec predicted that if the rate of improvement continues, the computing capabilities for human-level AI would be available in supercomputers before 2010. In 1998, Moravec predicted human-level AI by 2040, and intelligence far beyond human by 2050.

Four polls of AI researchers, conducted in 2012 and 2013 by Nick Bostrom and Vincent C. Müller, suggested a confidence of 50% that human-level AI would be developed by 2040–2050.
 
Plausibility
Prominent technologists and academics dispute the plausibility of a technological singularity, including Paul Allen, Jeff Hawkins, John Holland, Jaron Lanier, Steven Pinker, Theodore Modis, and Gordon Moore, whose law is often cited in support of the concept.
Most proposed methods for creating superhuman or transhuman minds fall into one of two categories: intelligence amplification of human brains and artificial intelligence. The many speculated ways to augment human intelligence include bioengineering, genetic engineering, nootropic drugs, AI assistants, direct brain–computer interfaces and mind uploading. These multiple possible paths to an intelligence explosion, all of which will presumably be pursued, makes a singularity more likely.
Robin Hanson expressed skepticism of human intelligence augmentation, writing that once the "low-hanging fruit" of easy methods for increasing human intelligence have been exhausted, further improvements will become increasingly difficult. Despite all of the speculated ways for amplifying human intelligence, non-human artificial intelligence (specifically seed AI) is the most popular option among the hypotheses that would advance the singularity.
The possibility of an intelligence explosion depends on three factors. The first accelerating factor is the new intelligence enhancements made possible by each previous improvement. Contrariwise, as the intelligences become more advanced, further advances will become more and more complicated, possibly outweighing the advantage of increased intelligence. Each improvement should generate at least one more improvement, on average, for movement towards singularity to continue. Finally, the laws of physics may eventually prevent further improvement.
There are two logically independent, but mutually reinforcing, causes of intelligence improvements: increases in the speed of computation, and improvements to the algorithms used. The former is predicted by Moore's Law and the forecasted improvements in hardware, and is comparatively similar to previous technological advances. But Schulman and Sandberg argue that software will present more complex challenges than simply operating on hardware capable of running at human intelligence levels or beyond.
A 2017 email survey of authors with publications at the 2015 NeurIPS and ICML machine learning conferences asked about the chance that "the intelligence explosion argument is broadly correct". Of the respondents, 12% said it was "quite likely", 17% said it was "likely", 21% said it was "about even", 24% said it was "unlikely" and 26% said it was "quite unlikely".
 
~*~*~~*~*~~*~*~~*~*~~*~*~~*~*~*~*~~*~*~~*~*~
**
👇  📺  👇

A.I. Singularity
Technological Singularity
*******
👇  🤖  👇
  ****
In this groundbreaking video, we dive deep into "The 10 Steps Towards the AI Singularity." Buckle up, because we're about to embark on an incredible journey through the evolution of artificial intelligence and the remarkable path that leads us toward the AI singularity. If you're intrigued by the future of technology, the convergence of human intelligence and machine learning, and the potential implications for our world, this video is a must-watch.

We begin by exploring the foundational concepts of AI, unraveling the intricate web of machine learning, neural networks, and deep learning. Through this comprehensive breakdown, you'll gain a profound understanding of the tools and techniques driving AI advancements. We'll examine the historical context, tracing AI's origins from Alan Turing's pioneering work to contemporary innovations like GPT-3.

As we proceed through the video, you'll discover the crucial milestones that bring us closer to the AI singularity. We discuss the accelerating pace of technological progress and the ever-increasing capabilities of AI systems. With each step, we'll explore the ethical and societal implications, shedding light on the importance of responsible AI development.

Our journey culminates in a discussion of the AI singularity itself, a theoretical point in the future where AI reaches a level of superintelligence, potentially surpassing human capabilities. We'll delve into the debates surrounding the singularity, from the excitement of boundless possibilities to the concerns about unintended consequences.

Prepare to be enlightened, as this video provides a comprehensive, expertly curated exploration of "The 10 Steps Towards the AI Singularity." Join us in unraveling the mysteries of AI, from its humble beginnings to the threshold of an extraordinary future. Don't miss out on this opportunity to gain insights into the future of technology and its profound impact on our world. Subscribe, like, and share this video to join the conversation and stay informed about the AI singularity's fascinating journey.

https://youtu.be/AkuZedKiXTc?si=7qlCtDl804-d3KiL

~*~*~~*~*~~*~*~~*~*~~*~*~~*~*~*~*~~*~*~~*~*~
~*~*~~*~*~~*~*~~*~*~~*~*~~*~*~*~*~~*~*~~*~*~
**
👇  📺  👇

~*~*~~*~*~~*~*~~*~*~~*~*~~*~*~*~*~~*~*~~*~*~
*
~*~*~~*~*~~*~*~~*~*~~*~*~~*~*~*~*~~*~*~~*~*~


End Txt
~*~*~~*~*~~*~*~~*~*~~*~*~~*~*~*~*~~*~*~~*~*~



**
Center
*🤖*
http://i.imgur.com/G5DKX1P.gif
               

No comments: